Somatic symptoms in consultation-liaison psychiatry.
Grover, Sandeep, Kate, Natasha · International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England) · 2013 · DOI
Quick Summary
This review discusses how doctors who specialize in both medical and mental health (called consultation-liaison psychiatrists) can help patients with ME/CFS and similar conditions where physical symptoms don't have a clear medical explanation. The review explains that these patients often experience depression and anxiety alongside their physical symptoms, and they use healthcare services frequently. Treatment options include talking therapies, cognitive behavior therapy, and antidepressants, which work with varying degrees of success.
Why It Matters
This review is relevant to ME/CFS because it addresses the high rates of psychiatric comorbidity in patients with medically unexplained symptoms and proposes integrated psychiatric care as a management strategy. Understanding the role of mental health support alongside medical care may help improve outcomes and reduce unnecessary healthcare utilization in ME/CFS populations.
Observed Findings
ME/CFS is recognized as a medical condition with somatic symptoms that cannot be fully explained by existing medical illness
Patients with medically unexplained somatic symptoms have elevated rates of depression and anxiety disorders
These patients have disproportionately high healthcare utilization including outpatient visits and hospitalizations
Multiple management strategies exist including reattribution, cognitive behavior therapy, and antidepressants with varying degrees of success
Consultation-liaison psychiatrists play a role in evaluating and managing psychiatric comorbidity in medically ill patients
Inferred Conclusions
Integrated psychiatric care is necessary for comprehensive management of patients with medically unexplained somatic symptoms
Psychiatric comorbidity significantly contributes to distress, functional impairment, and healthcare costs in these populations
A patient-centered approach combining psychiatric evaluation and treatment is recommended for optimal outcomes
No single management strategy demonstrates uniform effectiveness, suggesting individualized treatment approaches may be necessary
Remaining Questions
What is the relative efficacy of different psychological and pharmacological interventions for ME/CFS specifically?
What This Study Does Not Prove
This review does not establish that psychiatric disorders cause ME/CFS or that psychological treatment alone is curative for the physical symptoms of ME/CFS. It does not provide quantitative evidence comparing the effectiveness of different treatment approaches, nor does it address disease-specific mechanisms or biomarkers. The review also does not clarify whether psychiatric symptoms are primary features or secondary consequences of the illness.
About the PEM badge: “PEM required” means post-exertional malaise was an explicit required diagnostic criterion for participant inclusion in this study — not that PEM was studied, observed, or discussed. Studies using criteria that do not require PEM (e.g. Fukuda, Oxford) are tagged “PEM not required”. How the atlas works →
Contribute
Private, reviewed by a human. Not a public comment thread.