Paolucci, Stefania, Piralla, Antonio, Zanello, Cinzia et al. · The new microbiologica · 2012
This study looked for two viruses (XMRV and MLV-related viruses) that had been suggested as possible causes of ME/CFS. Researchers tested 12 ME/CFS patients and 40 healthy control subjects. They found these viruses in only 2 of the 12 patients, while all controls tested negative. The results suggest these viruses are not common in ME/CFS patients, and previous reports of finding them may have been due to laboratory contamination with mouse DNA.
This study addresses a significant controversy in ME/CFS research regarding whether viral infections like XMRV might be involved in disease pathogenesis. By demonstrating that these viruses are not prevalent in ME/CFS patients and that contamination does not fully explain previous conflicting results, it helps clarify the actual role—if any—of these agents in ME/CFS and redirects research focus toward more promising etiological pathways.
This study does not prove that XMRV and MLV-related viruses play no role in ME/CFS pathogenesis, as the small sample size and the detection of these sequences in 2 patients leaves open the possibility of involvement in a subset of cases. It also does not establish whether other viral or infectious agents might be involved in ME/CFS. The study cannot determine causation or explain the mechanism behind the controversial earlier findings.
About the PEM badge: “PEM required” means post-exertional malaise was an explicit required diagnostic criterion for participant inclusion in this study — not that PEM was studied, observed, or discussed. Studies using criteria that do not require PEM (e.g. Fukuda, Oxford) are tagged “PEM not required”. How the atlas works →
Contribute
Private, reviewed by a human. Not a public comment thread.