Taylor, R R, Jason, L A, Torres, A · Psychological medicine · 2000 · DOI
This study compared two popular questionnaires that doctors use to measure fatigue in ME/CFS patients: the Fatigue Scale and the Fatigue Severity Scale. Researchers tested both tools on people with varying levels of fatigue, including those with ME/CFS-like symptoms and healthy people. The study found that while both tools are useful, the Fatigue Severity Scale better captures how fatigue affects daily functioning and quality of life in people with ME/CFS.
Accurate fatigue measurement is essential for diagnosing ME/CFS, tracking disease progression, and evaluating treatment effectiveness. This study helps clinicians and researchers choose the most appropriate assessment tool for ME/CFS populations, improving consistency and reliability in patient evaluation and research outcomes.
This study does not prove what causes ME/CFS fatigue or why these scales work better for some people than others. It only compares how well two existing questionnaires measure fatigue—it doesn't establish whether either scale can predict disease progression, response to treatment, or underlying biological mechanisms.
About the PEM badge: “PEM required” means post-exertional malaise was an explicit required diagnostic criterion for participant inclusion in this study — not that PEM was studied, observed, or discussed. Studies using criteria that do not require PEM (e.g. Fukuda, Oxford) are tagged “PEM not required”. How the atlas works →
The first block is for the primary paper and is the citation you should use in research work. The atlas-snapshot line only applies if you are specifically referring to this atlas’s reading of the paper on the date shown.
Primary citation
Taylor, R R, Jason, L A, & Torres, A (2000). Fatigue rating scales: an empirical comparison.. Psychological medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291799002500
BibTeX
@article{mecfsatlas-taylor-2000-fatigue-rating,
author = {Taylor, R R and Jason, L A and Torres, A},
title = {Fatigue rating scales: an empirical comparison.},
journal = {Psychological medicine},
year = {2000},
doi = {10.1017/s0033291799002500},
note = {PubMed: 11037093},
url = {https://www.mecfsatlas.com/evidence/taylor-2000-fatigue-rating},
}Atlas snapshot reference
ME/CFS Atlas. Generator v1 / Scanner v1.4 / policy v0.1. Accessed 2026-05-26. https://www.mecfsatlas.com/evidence/taylor-2000-fatigue-rating
Contribute
Private, reviewed by a human. Not a public comment thread.