Banerjee, Anirban, Hendrick, Paul, Bhattacharjee, Purba et al. · Patient education and counseling · 2018 · DOI
This review looked at 25 studies to find out which questionnaires and tests best measure how well people manage their chronic pain on their own. Researchers found 14 different measurement tools that assess things like pain coping skills, confidence, and self-care. The review suggests that tools measuring multiple aspects of self-management—like the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory and Health Education Impact Questionnaire—work best for tracking how people manage their conditions.
ME/CFS patients often rely on self-management strategies to cope with symptom fluctuations and activity limitations. This review establishes which validated measurement tools are most comprehensive for assessing self-management outcomes, informing future ME/CFS clinical trials and intervention studies. Understanding effective self-management assessment is particularly relevant for ME/CFS, where patient-directed pacing and coping strategies are central to symptom management.
This study does not demonstrate that any specific self-management intervention is effective for ME/CFS or other chronic pain conditions—it only reviews the tools used to measure self-management in past trials. It does not establish which self-management strategies patients should actually use, nor does it prove that improving self-management scores leads to better health outcomes. The findings are specific to chronic pain populations and may not directly translate to ME/CFS without validation in that population.
About the PEM badge: “PEM required” means post-exertional malaise was an explicit required diagnostic criterion for participant inclusion in this study — not that PEM was studied, observed, or discussed. Studies using criteria that do not require PEM (e.g. Fukuda, Oxford) are tagged “PEM not required”. How the atlas works →
The first block is for the primary paper and is the citation you should use in research work. The atlas-snapshot line only applies if you are specifically referring to this atlas’s reading of the paper on the date shown.
Primary citation
Banerjee, Anirban, Hendrick, Paul, Bhattacharjee, Purba, & Blake, Holly (2018). A systematic review of outcome measures utilised to assess self-management in clinical trials in patients with chronic pain.. Patient education and counseling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.12.002
BibTeX
@article{mecfsatlas-banerjee-2018-systematic-review,
author = {Banerjee, Anirban and Hendrick, Paul and Bhattacharjee, Purba and Blake, Holly},
title = {A systematic review of outcome measures utilised to assess self-management in clinical trials in patients with chronic pain.},
journal = {Patient education and counseling},
year = {2018},
doi = {10.1016/j.pec.2017.12.002},
note = {PubMed: 29258726},
url = {https://www.mecfsatlas.com/evidence/banerjee-2018-systematic-review},
}Atlas snapshot reference
ME/CFS Atlas. Generator v1 / Scanner v1.4 / policy v0.1. Accessed 2026-05-29. https://www.mecfsatlas.com/evidence/banerjee-2018-systematic-review
Contribute
Private, reviewed by a human. Not a public comment thread.